Vulture Funds in Africa

Description

The map illustrates the commercial creditor lawsuits against countries receiving the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative and Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI) Assistance (As of the end of 2007) Lawsuits by commercial creditors to collect on outstanding HIPC country debt can erode gains made through debt relief. International courts and U.S. federal courts have allowed commercial creditors to pursue legal action in order to recover funds owed to them, but these creditors are sometimes viewed as creating difficult circumstances for countries that have received debt relief from other creditors.1 As of the end of 2007, based on survey data provided by country governments, 47 litigating creditors had filed suits against 11 countries receiving HIPC Initiative and MDRI debt relief (see table 7). Over $1 billion has been awarded by courts and is due to commercial creditors. About one-third of this total, or over $440 million, has been awarded against the Republic of Congo, followed by over $350 million against Liberia, and $100 million against the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Treasury officials told us that while a court can award claims in favor of commercial creditors, actually enforcing the judgments and receiving payment is a separate, potentially more difficult exercise. The international community has taken numerous actions to address such cases: •The World Bank’s Debt Reduction Facility (DRF) allows governments to buy back—at a deep discount—country debts owed to external, commercial creditors. Through grants, the DRF supports heavily indebted IDA-only countries that undertake reforms to retain professional services necessary in preparing these commercial debt reduction operations and assists the countries in funding the cost of these operations. For example, court judgments against Nicaragua were settled through the DRF-supported buyback. All four litigating creditors participated in the buyback operation and accepted a significant cut in the value of their legal claims. The Nicaragua buyback extinguished about $1.3 billion in commercial debt. Another buyback operation has been concluded for Mozambique. Furthermore, according to Treasury officials, a DRF operation is currently being prepared for Liberia, and the United States intends to contribute $5 million to help fund the cost of this buyback. • Paris Club creditors have committed as a group not to sell claims on HIPC countries to creditors who do not intend to provide debt relief. In April 2008, AfDB approved a proposal to establish the African Legal Support Facility (ALSF), which would provide (1) technical legal advice to members of the facility in creditor litigation, and (2) technical legal assistance to members of the facility to strengthen their legal expertise and negotiating capacity in matters related to debt management and other issues.3 The U.S. government was the only participating state to vote against establishment of the ALSF, and Treasury officials have noted that countries that have been the target of recent litigation have had very able legal representation to date, calling into question the need for ALSF assistance. In addition, Treasury staff expressed a position that some of the proposed activities for the ALSF are not an appropriate use of AfDB funds and noted concerns over the substantial administrative costs associated with ALSF. Furthermore, Treasury staff have emphasized that the DRF—an option already in operation that is achieving results in reducing country debt burdens to commercial creditors—is a preferred alternative. Source: January 2009, United States Government Accountability Office, Developing Countries: The United States Has Not Fully Funded Its Share of Debt Relief, and the Impact of Debt Relief on Countries’ Poverty-Reducing Spending is Unknown