From Otto von Bismarck to “Harry and Louise,” the idea of universal health care has fueled public debate for more than a century. Ever since major European nations adopted compulsory coverage plans, the quest for national health insurance has vexed U.S. policymakers.
Congress has tackled the issue nearly every decade, and the debate has featured a noteworthy cast of characters. Congressional leaders, Republicans, Democrats and socialists have all advocated some type of national health insurance program. But when the debate gets to Congress, attempts to enact comprehensive packages have largely failed after being hijacked by special interests. Alternative — and less comprehensive — measures carry the day.
Every year, people are fighting and protesting for affordable health care plan. Yet, Health care costs in the United States exceed those of any other nation. Millions of Americans are uninsured, partly because of rising premium costs, and more and more, they resort to payday loans to finance both emergency and routine medical expenses. Since health care issues are taking center stage in the political arena, this isn't the time to simply step back and look at things from a mere basic point of view? Is it really possible to have a healthier society and more effective medical care without, first and foremost, reducing the need and thus the demand for medical treatment?
Dipity
Update Sources Now
Comments