Recent Event Highlights: OFA - 2009 OFA Annual Meeting - Day Two - Lunch, Ronald Reagan Testimony Part 31: Iran-Contra Affair / Poindexter Trial (1990), Prop 8 Trial Re-enactment, Day 3 Chapter 1 (re-edit), Prince of Asturias, Crown Prince of Spain - Zeitgeist Europe 2009, Nestle Kills Workers!!! NESTLE IS ABOVE THE LAW!!!, and 5 more...
Created by dipity on Feb 12, 2011
Last updated: 06/26/11 at 12:23 PM
In October, 2010, Alice Walker joined Googlers in Mountain View for a day of conversation and readings from her latest book of poetry, Hard Times Require Furious Dancing. "[This] collection of new poems is written especially for the times we're living through. Alice Walker is known throughout the world as not only a great writer but an activist and a woman who shares the inner turmoil and outer struggles of her life. Readers admire her ability to bare her heart and soul, but to also speak out about the world as she sees it, often becoming a catalyst for change. As the title [Hard Times Require Furious Dancing] suggests, these poems were written during struggles and sadness and deal with the loss of siblings, the loss of a beloved dog, the estrangement in families, violence and struggles on the world stage, and the simple joy of life itself. The words dance, they sing, they heal our hearts and touch our souls." Excerpt from the Press Release from New World Library. If you want to hear Alice Walker reading from Hard Times -- you can check out her YouTube channel: www.youtube.com
More info at (www.acf.hhs.gov) We allow comments according to our comment policy newmedia.hhs.gov
February 17, 1990 www.amazon.com Watch the full testimony: thefilmarchived.blogspot.com During the 1980s the Reagan administration sponsored an anti-Sandinista guerilla movement known as the Contras (a proxy paramilitary based in Honduras and Costa Rica, largely consisting of northern highlanders known as the Milpas and led by former Somoza regime soldiers) against the socialist Sandinista government in Nicaragua. The resulting war killed over 50000 people, mostly civilians. Under the Carter Administration, the Sandinistas had received tacit US support in their coup against the previously US-backed right-wing military dictatorship of the Somoza dynasty, which had ruled the country for several decades. An interim coalition, Junta, took power in 1979 and in 1984 leader of the FSLN party, Daniel Ortega became Nicaragua's first elected President who ruled under the name of the Sandinista revolution. As the years progressed, the Ortega government was accused of becoming more authoritarian, with the more moderate factions of the coalition being expelled from government. Allegations of suppression of political dissent increased, as did accusations of state-sponsored human rights abuses. However, these accusations of human rights abuses were not accurate, according to Human Rights Watch: "Almost invariably, US pronouncements on human rights exaggerated and distorted the real human rights violations of the Sandinista regime, and exculpated those of the US-supported insurgents ...
Four of the nation's top constitutional scholars review and discuss those decisions from the Supreme Court's October 2008 Term that are most likely to affect the work of federal judges. Professor Erwin Chemerinsky (University of California Irvine, School of Law), Professor Evan Lee (University of California, Hastings College of the Law), Professor Laurie Levenson (Loyola Law School), and Professor Suzanna Sherry (Vanderbilt University Law School) address the issues and implications of decisions in the areas of criminal law and procedure, habeas corpus, employment discrimination law, and civil rights, among other topics.
November 3, 1989 www.amazon.com Watch the full film: thefilmarchived.blogspot.com During the 1980s the Reagan administration sponsored an anti-Sandinista guerrilla movement known as the Contras (a proxy paramilitary based in Honduras and Costa Rica, largely consisting of northern highlanders known as the Milpas and led by former Somoza regime soldiers) against the socialist Sandinista government in Nicaragua. The resulting war killed over 50000 people, mostly civilians. Under the Carter Administration, the Sandinistas had received tacit US support in their coup against the previously US-backed right-wing military dictatorship of the Somoza dynasty, which had ruled the country for several decades. An interim coalition, Junta, took power in 1979 and in 1984 leader of the FSLN party, Daniel Ortega became Nicaragua's first elected President who ruled under the name of the Sandinista revolution. As the years progressed, the Ortega government was accused of becoming more authoritarian, with the more moderate factions of the coalition being expelled from government. Allegations of suppression of political dissent increased, as did accusations of state-sponsored human rights abuses. However, these accusations of human rights abuses were not accurate, according to Human Rights Watch: "Almost invariably, US pronouncements on human rights exaggerated and distorted the real human rights violations of the Sandinista regime, and exculpated those of the US-supported insurgents, known as ...
Day 3 Chapter 1 of the Proposition 8 Trial Re-enactment presented by MarriageTrial.com. Produced by John Ainsworth & John Ireland. Edited by Michael Legge. THE JUDGE Vaughn Walker, Chief Judge, US District Court portrayed by Ted Heyck THE PLAINTIFFS Paul Katami portrayed by Woody Schultz Jeffrey Zarrillo portrayed by Bryan Cuprill Kristin Perry portrayed by Kitty Swink Sandy Stier portrayed by Tess Harper THE PLAINTIFF ATTORNEYS David Boies portrayed by Jack Laufer Theodore Olson portrayed by Clyde FT Small Theodore Boutrous portrayed by Peter Cassone Christopher Dusseault portrayed by Jon Keel Matthew McGill portrayed by Mark Doerr Ethan Dettmer portrayed by Shawn Ryan THE PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR ATTORNEYS Dennis Herrera, SF City Attorney portrayed by Matt Pittenger Therese Stewart, SF Deputy City Attorney portrayed by Sarah Gaboury Christine Van Aken, SF City Attorney Portayed by Kate McNeil Danny Chou, SF City Attorney portrayed by Peter James Smith SF City Attorney Ronald Flynn portrayed by Todd Waring THE DEFENDANTS Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Governor Does not appear at trial. Edmund G. Brown, California Attorney General Does not appear at trial. Linette Scott, Deputy Director of Health & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health Does not appear at trial. Patrick OConnell, Clerk-Recorder County of Alameda Does not appear at trial. Dean Logan, Clerk-Recorder County of Los Angeles Does not appear at trial. THE DEFENDANT ATTORNEY Tamar ...
PART ONE: PUTTING A PRICE TAG ON LIFE Today, companies and governments often use Jeremy Benthams utilitarian logic under the name of cost-benefit analysis. Sandel presents some contemporary cases in which cost-benefit analysis was used to put a dollar value on human life. The cases give rise to several objections to the utilitarian logic of seeking the greatest good for the greatest number. Should we always give more weight to the happiness of a majority, even if the majority is cruel or ignoble? Is it possible to sum up and compare all values using a common measure like money? PART TWO: HOW TO MEASURE PLEASURE Sandel introduces JS Mill, a utilitarian philosopher who attempts to defend utilitarianism against the objections raised by critics of the doctrine. Mill argues that seeking the greatest good for the greatest number is compatible with protecting individual rights, and that utilitarianism can make room for a distinction between higher and lower pleasures. Mills idea is that the higher pleasure is always the pleasure preferred by a well-informed majority. Sandel tests this theory by playing video clips from three very different forms of entertainment: Shakespeares Hamlet, the reality show Fear Factor, and The Simpsons. Students debate which experience provides the higher pleasure, and whether Mills defense of utilitarianism is successful.
KOMA Board chair Shirley Brown-VanArsdale asked Mark Ferguson, college counsel, to communicate the findings and results of an inquiry and investigation as to whether the college violated the Kansas Open Meetings Act during an executive session of the board meeting on Feb. 19. Ferguson reviewed statements made in the media, notes made when investigating the matter, the minutes of the meeting, relevant statutes, and interpretation of KOMA both by the Kansas courts and the office of the attorney general. He also spoke with the Kansas attorney generals office and an assistant district attorney in Johnson County. After a complete review of the facts and circumstances surrounding the allegations, he is of the opinion that no violations of KOMA occurred at the February meeting and that the board fully complied with the Kansas Open Meetings Act and with its own board policies related to conducting an executive session. Faculty Association Mike Martin, president of the Faculty Association, reviewed aspects of the current negotiation process and announced the associations endorsement of four candidates for the board election: Bob Drummond, Peter Jouras, Melody Rayl and Stephanie Sharp. Student Senate Andre Jones, Senate president, gave the board an overview of upcoming events, such as Daffodil Day on March 27 and a rally to show appreciation for the colleges championship teams on April 1. Foundation Trustee Don Weiss reviewed upcoming Foundation events, including the Dollars for ...
Spain and Iberoamérica
Pls.sign our petition @ www.pinas-first.com TheSupreme Court of the Republic of the Philippines in their Notice of Judgment: "The ruling of the Court of Appeals on the inclusion of the Retirement Plan as a valid issue in the collective bargaining negotiations between UFE-DFA-KMU and Nestle is AFFIRMED. The parties are directed to resume negotiations respecting the Retirement Plan and to take action consistent with the discussions hereinabove set forth. (the Supreme Court of the Republic of the Philippines 1st Division GRNos.158930-31/ GRNos.158944-45 UFE-DFA-KMU VS. Nestle Phils., Inc. August 22, 2006) And that the same has, on March 26, 2008 become FINAL and EXECUTORY and is hereby recorded in the Book of Entries of Judgments. The previous Nestle management, by no doubt, guilty of unfair labor practice when it set as precondition for the CBA negotiations the issue on the retirement plan of the workers. The management used against us workers the already won Supreme Court decision. "The Court agrees with the NLRC's findings that the Retirement Plan was a collective bargaining issue right from the start { p.109 Rollo} for the improvement of the existing Retirement Plan was one of the original CBA proposals submitted by the UFE on May 8, 1987 to Arthur Gilmore, President of Nestle Phils..." ( The Supreme Court in GR No. 90231, February 4, 1991, entitled Nestle Phils. Inc. VS NLRC ) How easily can the multi-national company Nestle lambaste the decision of the highest court in ...
Update Sources